(Side note: Don't you love how the anti-Barbie crowd enjoys trotting out Barbie's "real-life" measurements as examples of why playing with her is damaging to children? As if all other toys measure up perfectly to the real-life test.)
I actually was among those saddened that Barbie lost some inches from her bust. It was a surrender for Mattel to political correctness, in my opinion. Give me a Superstar face mold and a busty body form any day. Why am I bringing all this up now? Because "Busty Barbie" once again is making headlines because of #10 in the Barbie Basics line. She allegedly has got big boobs to hold up her sexy dress with a plunging neckline.
Apparently overlooking that the Barbie Basics dolls are geared toward adult collectors, conservative mommies who don't want their daughters growing up to think Heidi Montag is a role model are speaking out.
Seriously, one of the mothers quoted in the article brought up Montag. There's also mention of Tiger Woods' mistresses. Naturally, big boobs and a plunging dress line = crazy people who engage in too much plastic surgery and waffle house workers who prey on married famous men.
Cleavage is so evil, some upset parents are calling for the busty offender to be pulled from store shelves (because even having the option of purchasing a doll with bigger boobs is scarring for some children, apparently). I have to ask: What happens when some of the young girls of these parents grow up to have (heaven forbid it) big boobs? Will they be ashamed of them, having been taught it's wrong or abnormal?
I think the whole controversy is silly (or maybe you could tell that from my rampant use of sarcasm in this post). There are causes more worthy of time and attention in this world than the size of one doll's boobs.



